Thursday, May 7, 2009

An Inconvenient Truth: Argument Task 4


Many documentaries like An Inconvenient Truth movie, campaign and researches have been made to solve the global warming issue. While several critics praised the movie’s aim, the others haven’t well-liked it. This essay will outline some arguments for and against this movie.
Many people were arguing for the movie. First of all, his points were in the movie’s goal; Al Gore’s presenting the film in a very attractive and had much background. For instance, he presented his argument in an interesting way by adding some jokes and some clips. Furthermore, point it was clear that he did not use his documentary for any political purpose. To illustrates, he was very smart and did not revolve this to political transmit. Helen reviews, stated that Al Gorge’s charts, statistic and scientists studies showed that global warming is not new fact (O’Hara 2).To clarify; they support their opinion by some great climate researchers who says that Al Gore got the right facts
After I mentioned the positive argument lets now turn our attention to some negative points. The first point to mansion is that reviewers believe that he was trying to get some negative points against the republicans. For example, they believe that al Gore’s speech was prepared with some jokes and sarcastic remarks against Bush administration and other Republicans. Another point to consider is that Al Gore took very long stage to tell that a global warming is happening. According to Scott, the film doesn’t appear to be about global warming but it is regarding Al Gorge’s life (Scott 1).

In conclusion it has been established that “An Inconvenient Truth” conveyed the science correctly the world and it could be solved by humans too. It has been a wakeup all call for all people around the world to realize the impacts of their actions and how they contribute to the problem of global warming.

0 comments:

Post a Comment